RGTIL : Victims United : 16

Hello world,
i was badly indosped after i posted a blog on 08-01-2011.
i feel better , so i resume .
i thought i never informed our (1) Dr.Manmohan Singh,Prime Minister (2) Mrs. Sonia Gandhi ,Chair Person, National Advisory Council and (3) members of National Advisory Council . They never knew that CVC Thomas had a tainted past ! They might turn up to say, ” Oh !, This is what our dear boy, Mukesh has done to land owners of our india!No body informed us. Otherwise….” All of them should have the first hand knowledge of the plight of RGTIL Victims in Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Karnatak & Tamilnadu . Gujarat CM Narendra Modi is still in Vibrant trance! He is in no mood to listen to other things! So i sent a common letter to them addressed to PMO .As it is a known fact that Chair Person, National Advisory Council and (3)members of National Advisory Council are serviced by PMO.So why to waste scarce funds in sending separate letters to them. They function under the same roof. i facilitated easy communication.
i quote,

I quote,

“For the perusal of the (a) Prime Minister & Union Cabinet ,
(b) Chair Person, National Advisory Council,
(c) Members of National Advisory Council through Secretary , National Advisory Council.

To.
Dr. Manmohan Singh
The Prime Minister of India
Pime Minister’s Office,
Govt. of India,
South Block, Raisina Hill,
New Delhi,
India-110 101.

Smt. Sonia Gandhi
Chair Person,
National Advisory Council

Secretary
National Advisory Council

i sent the following e mail today evening.
i forward it with my initials for your perusal.

i sent letters to (1) Minister & Secretary of Mo P & NG and (2) Joint Secretary, Ministry of Law & Justice on 11-03-2009 .

i submitted a memorandum to Mr.Murli Deora at Surat on 30-09-2009 followed by a letter to him. (India Post RLAD receipt is of 10-10-2009.)

i sent a letter to Dr. Veerappa Moily , Minister of Law & Justice (India Post RLAD receipt is of 14-10-2009.)

I did NOT receive any reply.

With that reference please read the contents of the following mail and papers enclosed herewith .

Wed, January 5, 2011 3:31pm
From: bankim desai
Add to Contacts
To: manmohan@sansad.nic.in
________________________________________

To.
The Prime Minister,
Pime Minister’s Office,
Govt. of India,
New Delhi.

My Dear Dr. Manmohan Singh,
i submit the following text related to Mr.Mukesh Ambani and his own, private
company, RGTIL.
Please consider all the blogs published as Desaibankim’s blog as my petition
against Mr.Mukesh Ambani & RGTIL.
If necessary , i am ready to submit these blogs with my signature.
Thanking you,
Yours sincerely,
Dr.Bankimchandra M.Desai 3
“RGTIL, Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Limited, a company owned
solely by Mukesh Ambani through a string of his private companies, is
masquerading various villages in Indian states in the name of development and
holding / ransacking numerous land owners and their properties at sort of a
ransom in the name of the Petroleum and Mineral Pipelines Act, 1962 (P and MP
Act, 1962 and P and MP Rules) and Land Acquisition Act. RGTIL men deploy all techniques and get their work done. Both the acts do not give any remedy to the aggrieved concerned and adjacent property owners. Both acts make the Competent Authority of RGTIL, the government within a government! The C.A. of RGTIL is beyond all laws.

RGTIL’s victims include rich, middle, lower, and below poverty line
farmers. Numerous land owners are marginal and small farmers. No one is happy
with RGTIL’s arbitrary behaviour and Award declared by the Competent Authority
of RGTIL.
No one in Govt. of India and respective state govt.s is ready to
listen to aggrieved land owners and owners of neighbourhood properties which are
already damaged by RGTIL.

Every land under User Rights is fragmented into three pieces, thus violating
Prevention of Fragmentation of Lands and Consolidation of Lands Act. Is this
proper? Where is the purpose of Fragmentation Act served? Govt. does not allow
fragmentation of agricultural lands under any pretext, not even by family
partition deeds. Govt. prohibits sale and purchase of fragments of agricultural
lands to farmers other than the owner/s of adjacent land. Here in RGTIL’s case
Govt. of India and various state governments created thousands of fragments of
agricultural lands without naming them fragments. Revenue records do not mention
these fragments anywhere. The mutations in Record of Rights do not reflect the fragmentation and provision for the sale of individual nonviable fragment by the owner of the land. The
mutation in Record of Rights is devoid of present and future responsibilities
and accountabilities of the party, company, person, association of persons
enjoying perennial user rights in land. The Award of RGTIL’s Competent Authority
forms the basis of mutation in Record of Rights in favour of RGTIL and the text
of the award is perennially binding on land owner / farmer.

In suits related to the Land Acquisition ACT and other related laws the Supreme
Court of India weighed the balance of convenience in favour of over all
development of the village, region, state and country .The SCI, in any case
, did not spell out the scope of such development by RGTIL at individual village
level. The SCI did not prefer to address other issues troubling farmers / land
owners because the Land Acquisition Act and the P and MP Act, 1962 and P and MP
Rules do not include these issues in their legal framework. Only the CAUSE was
considered and the RESULTANT EFFECTS were left for petitioners’ wild
guess. Obviously the SCI and High Courts do not want to go beyond laws and
consider the net results / effects these laws and their interpretation
create. Will the SCI ever take this issue for consideration? If yes, under the
purview of which act / law? Fundamental Rights are mostly in the sacred book
only. They are good for reading and preparing for various examinations..
That is the inherent weakness of powers and jurisdiction of our Apex Court and
High Courts. The Courts can not assume the role of law makers and law makers
enact such laws to benefit a special and a very special privileged class of
individuals, here in this case it is RGTIL and individual is MUKESH AMBANI.
The law makers have overt and covert interests to maintain status quo in laws like
the Land Acquisition Act, the P and MP ACt,1962, Company Act, Corporate Act,
Income Tax Act, Sales Tax Act, Custom Act etc. It is not that no one knows and
understands the lacunae in these acts/ laws. They JUST DO NOT WANT TO UNDERSTAND
and ACT ACCORDINGLY. There is a definite purpose behind this attitude. Every
Indian, literate and illiterate, knows this fact very well. Various constitutional and legal measures are made to abort intentionally. The SCI and High Courts witness this sorry state of affairs and allow people’s faith in rule of law to erode. Often people perceive that the judges are party to this phenomenon .The Supreme Court of India advised / directed 52 petitioners of Gujarat who suffered at the hands of RGTIL to approach respective trial court for the issues
related to compensation of lands in question. Are the petitioners expected to
face court ordeals for another twenty five years?

The pertinent questions are many.
1. Who rules India?
2. Why print and electronic media become deaf, dumb and blind on any issue of
public grievance relating to Mukesh Ambani and his companies?

3. Why all political parties turn away from the aggrieved land owners?
4. Why P and MP Act, 1962 and Land Acquisition Act are not amended to protect and
safe guard the interests of owners of land, adjacent (private as well as public / government) properties?

5. Why the interests of only RGTIL, ONGC, other PSUs and other companies
acquiring PERENNIAL USER Rights in LAND are protected?

6. Why the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts are shy in becoming
proactive in the interests of the aggrieved owners of land? The SCI has done it
in the past in many cases.
7. Why the said acts are only unilaterally binding on land owners as far as
responsibilities and accountabilities, at present and in future, are concerned?
8. Why the holder of PERENNIAL USER RIGHTS IN LAND has NO PERENNIAL
RESPONSIBILITY and ACCOUNTABILITY at present and in future?
9. Why this facade of justice is being perpetuated year by year?
10. Why Mukesh Ambani is so confident about his strides?
11. How he has become the richest man in a very short duration of time?
12. Why he is not subjected to any inquiry in the manner his fellow
industrialists and other citizens having doubtful assets are compelled to face?
13. What are the secrets of his companies?
14. Do the Minister of Finance, Minister of Law and Justice , Minister of
Petroleum and Natural Gas, Minister of Company Affairs , Minister of Corporate
Affairs and PMO recognise in built faults in the said acts/laws and rules ?
15. If they do, why they have not rectified them till today?
16. When they will do that? Or they will never do it….

Media in India is reticent in case of Mukesh Ambani and his companies. He failed
miserably to throttle Internet, Google, Yahoo, Facebook ,Twitter and other
social networks. Otherwise he has a potential to rival Hu Jin Tao of People’s
Republic of China and Kim the second of North Korea! That is a real danger
lurking the Indian Democracy and Polity. We experienced the STATE POWER many times
in the past .As i witness, experience and realise , MONEY POWER is superior to
state power. It has STATE POWER COUPLED WITH MUSCLE POWER of course in the best
available gloves! Today in India we have FREE PRESS. Do you find any criticism
of RGTIL and MUKESH AMBANI’s ways any where? WHY? Freedom of press, freedom of
expression and fundamental rights are good in books. Mukesh Ambani has
successfully eroded the STATE without contesting any election anywhere. Elections
are meant for fools. The reign of power is in Mukesh Ambani’s hands…Let him
overtake the STATE completely

i invite you all to view my blog series: Desaibankim’s Blogs: RGTIL: Victims
United: 01 to 11.i intends to continue the series till the said acts are amended …..
Thanks a lot.

(Dr, Bankimchandra M.Desai )
Encl:
1. Comments on Facebook, Twitter
2. Violations experienced & observed during implementation of P & MP Act, 1962
***************************************************
1. Comments on Facebook, Twitter
vasanji Bankimchandra Desai
@cjsdoc What is Parimal Nathwani doing to prevent Mukesh Ambani from cheating
farmers through RGTIL in Gujarat,A.P.,Tamilnadu and Karnataka?29 Dec »

@cjsdoc What is the condition of farmers fleeced by RIL’s land acquisition?What
is Parimal Nathwani doing to them ?29 Dec »

Dhirubhai Ambani’s simplicity is reflected at Sea Wind. Will Parimal Nathwani
show any of Mahatma’s “sea winds”?29 Dec FavoriteReplyDelet
Will Parimal Nathwani show any of Mahatma Gandhi’s or his inheritor’s vicious or
virtuous acquisition ?

»
Will Parimal Nathwani publish story behind story of his masters’ acquisition of
IPCL at Baroda ? Was it vicious or virtuous? Who helped?29 Dec FavoriteReplyDelete
»
Will Parimal Nathwani dare to publish white paper on ways ,means and methods of
Dhirubhai Ambani’s land acquisition at Hazira, Jamnagar ?29 Dec FavoriteReplyDelete

<Dhirubhai Ambani corrupted political parties including communists, Chandan Mitra
and Vinod Mehta will assist Parimal Nathwani in research29 Dec FavoriteReplyDelete
»
Mr Mukesh Ambani has to keep Mr. P. Nathwani as MP , NIIRA RADIA as PR Agent.
Will Mr. Parimal Nathwani show Mahatma's PR Agents?29 Dec
»
sharpnish Nishant @ZoomIndianMedia Interestingly ths story comes d vry nxt day aftr Parimal
Nathwani wrote on Ambani Sr., published in most of the newspapers!29 Dec

What about the vices of Ambani patriarch and his inheritors ?! Will Mr. Parimal
Nathwani lamnet and elaborate ??29 Dec »
i The joke of 2010 : Mr.Parimal Nathwani equates DHIRUBHAI AMBANI with MAHATMA
GANDHI ! Divya Bhaskar published his write up on Dec.28,

2. THE P & M P ACT 1962

IMPLEMENTATION OF SEC.3 (1) & 6 (1) ATTRACTS

VIOLATIONS OF OTHER
CENTRAL & STATE ACTS, RULES AND REGULATIONS

IPC SEC.405 BREACH OF TRUST

IPC SEC.406 PUNISHMENT FOR BREACH OF TRUST

IPC SEC.420 CHEATING

IPC SEC 463 FORGERY

PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION SEC13 ( 1 ) D AND 13 ( 2)

LAND REVENUE CODE

PREVENTION OF FRAGMENTATION ACT

RULES FOR BIFURCATION OF AGRICULTURAL BLOCK/SURVEY NO
.
COMPENSATION ACT

ACT AGAINST IMPOSTING AS GOVT SERVANT IN SERVICE

FABRICATION OF EVIDENCE

COMPANIES ACT

MONOPOLIES ACT

DERELICTION OF DUTY

RTI ACT

THIRD PARTY DAMAGE

REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE ACT, 1951 ( ACT NO. 43 OF 1951)

FOREIGNER’S ACT WITH VISA ACT WITH INTERNAL SECURITY ACT

CRPC SEC.202

I unquote”

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

One Response to “RGTIL : Victims United : 16”

  1. tax break 2011 Says:

    tax break 2011…

    […]RGTIL : Victims United : 16 « Desaibankim's Blog[…]…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: